7 minute learn
This month, we spoke with Dr. Cynthia Schuck-Paim and Dr. Wladimir J. Alonso, Co-Founders of the Welfare Footprint Institute (WFI), a non-profit analysis group devoted to growing and disseminating scientifically rigorous strategies for quantifying animal welfare.
With backgrounds in evolutionary biology, epidemiology, and animal welfare science, Cynthia and Wladimir co-founded WFI to advance the science of animal welfare and developed its central innovation—the Welfare Footprint Framework. By analysis, coaching, and consulting, they apply this framework worldwide to supply standardized, scientifically rigorous metrics for quantifying and evaluating welfare.
On this interview, they share the imaginative and prescient behind the Welfare Footprint Institute, how their framework helps combine animal expertise into coverage, trade, and advocacy, and their hopes for shaping a extra compassionate future for animals.
What’s the “Welfare Footprint Framework,” and the way does it work in follow?
The Welfare Footprint Framework (WFF) is a scientific methodology for quantifying animal welfare by way of lived experiences. It interprets proof from physiology, conduct, neurology, and pharmacology into standardized measures of time animals spend in adverse (Ache) and optimistic (Pleasure) affective states, at various intensities. These metrics—Cumulative Ache and Cumulative Pleasure—enable direct comparability of welfare impacts throughout species, techniques, animal-sourced merchandise, practices, and interventions.
In follow, the tactic follows a clear analytical chain: description of dwelling circumstances → mapping of their organic penalties and respective prevalences within the goal inhabitants → stock of ensuing affective experiences → calculation of metrics of cumulative welfare impacts. This evidence-to-judgment course of makes welfare impacts auditable and comparable, enabling any stakeholder (advocates, funders, producers, policymarkers, regulators, traders) to weigh animal welfare alongside prices, productiveness, environmental and social outcomes.
How do you resolve which animal welfare reforms or species to give attention to?
Our choice is guided by a mix of:
Magnitude of potential welfare acquire: reforms that may forestall the longest time of animal ache, significantly intense ache.
Resolution relevance: contexts the place metrics can inform coverage, trade, or advocacy selections which are underneath dialogue.
Feasibility of proof synthesis: species or practices the place information availability permits strong quantification.
Stakeholder demand: funders, advocacy teams, and trade actors usually request analyses of particular reforms they want to promote, and we goal to answer these requests once they align with our analytical requirements and potential for impression.
What are a few of the key findings or “massive wins” you’ve had to this point?
- Quantification of fish ache throughout slaughter. We estimated that rainbow trout expertise a median of as much as 22 minutes of intense ache throughout air asphyxia, with efficient beautiful probably averting 1-20 hours of reasonable to excessive ache per greenback spent in capital prices. This analysis reached over 100 media shops and an estimated 200-300 million folks globally, indicating that these concrete welfare metrics generate much more public engagement and media traction than summary welfare claims.
- Proof that larger welfare techniques should not prohibitively costly. Our Nature Meals research confirmed that switching to slower-growing broiler breeds might forestall 15-100 hours of intense ache per chook whereas including solely about $1/kg of meat. When environmental prices are monetized, the welfare positive factors value mere ten-thousandths of a greenback per hour of ache prevented–successfully debunking claims that welfare enhancements are too expensive or environmentally damaging.
- Discovering that barren environments amplify ache depth and delay therapeutic. Our analysis on “The Ache Echo Chamber” with main ache researchers reveals that ache is perceived as extra intense and takes longer to heal within the barren, intensive environments typical of contemporary animal agriculture–that means welfare issues in these techniques are worse than beforehand understood. A overview demonstrating these results is anticipated for 2026.
- Discovery that early-life situations form lifelong welfare in salmon. Our work on Atlantic salmon in RAS hatcheries revealed that early-life situations completely form welfare outcomes later in life. The work recognized three precedence interventions for the hatchery part, with varied organizations and certifiers with plans to include these suggestions into future welfare requirements. The work needs to be revealed quickly.
- Improvement of the primary complete Welfare Footprint of a product. The Welfare Footprint of the Egg (publishing 2026) quantifies 125 totally different affective experiences throughout all egg manufacturing techniques and assesses the impression of a number of interventions and reforms. This work, co-authored by over 60 teachers, supplies the primary full welfare evaluation of a whole manufacturing chain.
- Widespread adoption of the framework. Over 50 organizations at the moment are utilizing the Welfare Footprint Framework and our estimates for intervention prioritization, with varied teams integrating it immediately into their cost-effectiveness fashions.
- First main trade partnership. A main South American meat producer adopted the framework throughout its whole beef provide chain (~1,200 producers), utilizing it to determine cost-effective welfare enhancements like shade provision to cut back warmth stress, phasing out of practices equivalent to dehorning, and enhancements by way of transport period, provision of enrichment, amongst others.
- Integration into authorities decision-making. Some working teams are incorporating our estimates into welfare valuation fashions, and a few nationwide companies are utilizing the framework for animal cruelty litigation.
What are the most important challenges you face in quantifying animal welfare, and the way are you addressing them?
Subjectivity of affective states: We mitigate this by grounding estimates in express, multi-disciplinary proof, through the use of clear notation techniques (Ache-Monitor, Pleasure-Monitor) and by incorporating uncertainty and variability in all estimates.
Interspecific variations: we’re at present growing a framework for integrating variations in hedonic capability throughout species, in addition to for measuring variations within the distribution of struggling throughout populations.
Scaling adoption: We’re restricted by way of what number of species, techniques, and practices we will analyze immediately with our analysis capability. To handle this, we’ll proceed coaching teachers, advocates, policymakers and different stakeholders within the technique, enhance present AI instruments and develop new ones that may facilitate the analytical course of, in addition to launch new applications (e.g., an elite certification program to intensively practice people on the WFF) to develop our analysis capability.
Wanting forward, what’s on the horizon that excites you most about your work?
Wanting forward, what excites us most is the potential of serving to remodel how society addresses animal welfare. That is an formidable purpose, however we consider that whenever you measure animal welfare in concrete and relatable phrases–as an example, hours of intense ache quite than summary considerations–folks reply. Media shops disseminate the findings. Customers perceive the impacts. Policymakers can justify laws. Courts settle for rigorous proof. Retailers can set procurement requirements. Funders can optimize their impression. Firms can differentiate real enhancements. Advocates strengthen their campaigns with simple information. We’re simply getting began and we’re seeing optimistic impacts we had not anticipated. Taking a look at our roadmap for change and future plans, right here’s what excites me most:
Reaching a tipping level for systemic change: we consider that when now we have full Welfare Footprints for core animal merchandise (e.g., eggs, rooster, pork, fish, beef, dairy) the estimates can grow to be transformative.
The patron app going reside: we’re growing a cellular app to let consumers scan merchandise and immediately see their welfare impacts. Think about hundreds of thousands of customers out of the blue capable of see that one product causes 50 hours of intense ache whereas one other causes 5.
Serving to finish the period of deceptive welfare claims: with quantified welfare metrics, “humane-washed” merchandise will likely be uncovered. With welfare impacts quantified, the market can reward real enhancements quite than advertising and marketing
AI acceleration of our work: our Ache Atlas mission utilizing AI to map and quantify 1000’s of welfare challenges might cut back evaluation time by 50%. This implies we will develop protection exponentially – from a whole lot to probably 1000’s of welfare assessments per yr.
Trade transformation: with a serious meat producer already utilizing our framework and a certifier probably incorporating our suggestions, we’re seeing early indicators that welfare quantification can grow to be commonplace follow.
An Elite Certification Program creating unbiased capability: coaching consultants who can conduct assessments independently means our impression can multiply past our group’s capability.
Most essentially, we’re enthusiastic about making animal experiences simple—remodeling welfare from a subjective concern into goal, measurable actuality that calls for motion.
When you needed to share a last message with the ACE viewers, what would it not be?
Animal welfare is commonly sidelined as a result of it appears “immeasurable.” By expressing it as time in Ache and Pleasure, backed by simple scientific proof, we make animal expertise scientifically quantifiable, immediately comparable, and decision-relevant. This turns ethical concern into operational data that may shift coverage, markets, and shopper conduct towards decreasing animal struggling at scale.
Animal Charity Evaluators awarded the Welfare Footprint Institute a $50,000 Motion Grant to help their mission Bettering Farmed Fish Welfare at Slaughter by Reforming Pre-Slaughter Operations. This analysis will assist inform laws, advocacy, and trade practices to drive more practical welfare interventions. To study extra concerning the Welfare Footprint Institute and the way they’re making important change for animals, go to their web site.
Affect extra funding for animals
To help a spread of organizations working to cut back animal struggling across the globe, think about making a present to our Motion Grants program
ACE is devoted to making a world the place all animals can thrive, no matter their species. We take the
guesswork out of supporting animal advocacy by directing funds towards essentially the most impactful charities and applications,
based mostly on proof and analysis.
167
Recipients engaged on promising initiatives
42
International locations throughout six continents.
$68M
Donations throughout the animal advocacy motion.
$58,000,000+
in donations already made to our beneficial charities between January 2019 and March 2025
Seeking to make your first donation? We’re completely happy to assist