Braghieri, L., Levy, R. & Makarin, A. Social media and psychological well being. Am. Econ. Rev. 112, 3660–3693 (2022).
Van Bavel, J. J., Robertson, C. E., Del Rosario, Okay., Rasmussen, J. & Rathje, S. Social media and morality. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 75, 311–340 (2024).
Bail, C. Social-media reform is flying blind. Nature 603, 766 (2022).
Frewer, L. et al. Societal elements of genetically modified meals. Meals Chem. Toxicol. 42, 1181–1193 (2004).
Siegrist, M. & Hartmann, C. Shopper acceptance of novel meals applied sciences. Nat. Meals 1, 343–350 (2020).
Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y. & Rozin, P. Proof for absolute ethical opposition to genetically modified meals in the USA. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 11, 315–324 (2016).
Fernbach, P. M., Gentle, N., Scott, S. E., Inbar, Y. & Rozin, P. Excessive opponents of genetically modified meals know the least however assume they know essentially the most. Nat. Hum. Behav. 3, 251–256 (2019).
Cobb, M. D. & Macoubrie, J. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: dangers, advantages and belief. J. Nanopart. Res. 6, 395–405 (2004).
Lee, C.-J., Scheufele, D. A. & Lewenstein, B. V. Public attitudes towards rising applied sciences: analyzing the interactive results of cognitions and have an effect on on public attitudes towards nanotechnology. Sci. Commun. 27, 240–267 (2005).
Danaher, J. & Sætra, H. S. Mechanisms of techno-moral change: a taxonomy and overview. Moral Principle Ethical Pract. 26, 763–784 (2023). This text presents a exact and generative taxonomy of how expertise reshapes ethical life, offering a conceptual basis for designing sci-fi-sci eventualities with mechanistic readability.
Goldin, C. & Katz, L. F. The ability of the capsule: oral contraceptives and girls’s profession and marriage choices. J. Pol. Econ. 110, 730–770 (2002).
Bailey, M. J. Extra energy to the capsule: the affect of contraceptive freedom on girls’s life cycle labor provide. Q. J. Econ. 121, 289–320 (2006).
Baker, R. Earlier than Bioethics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2013).
Shariff, A., Inexperienced, J. & Jettinghoff, W. The privateness mismatch: developed intuitions in a digital world. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 30, 159–166 (2021).
Zuboff, S.The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Combat for a Human Future on the New Frontier of Energy (PublicAffairs, 2019).
Collingridge, D. The Social Management of Know-how (Pinter, 1980). This foundational work diagnoses the dilemma of management in technological growth, which sci-fi-sci makes an attempt to sort out by producing early empirical insights earlier than lock-in happens.
Fergnani, A. Mapping futures research scholarship from 1968 to current: a bibliometric overview of thematic clusters, analysis developments, and analysis gaps. Futures 105, 104–123 (2019).
Kuosa, T. Evolution of futures research. Futures 43, 327–336 (2011).
Danaher, J. & Sætra, H. S. Know-how and ethical change: the transformation of reality and belief. Ethics Inf. Technol. 24, 35 (2022).
Hopster, J. Okay. & Maas, M. M. The expertise triad: disruptive AI, regulatory gaps and worth change. AI Ethics 4, 1051–1069 (2024).
Brey, P. Ethics of Rising Know-how 175–191 (Rowman & Littlefield, 2017).
Pohl, F. The nice new innovations. Galaxy 27, 6 (1968).
Bonnefon, J.-F., Shariff, A. & Rahwan, I. The social dilemma of autonomous autos. Science 352, 1573–1576 (2016).
Shariff, A., Bonnefon, J.-F. & Rahwan, I. Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving autos. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 694–696 (2017).
Awad, E. et al. The Ethical Machine experiment. Nature 563, 59–64 (2018). This examine is a traditional instance of sci-fi-sci, experimentally probing public ethical preferences for a speculative expertise (totally autonomous autos) by way of a large world dataset of 40 million choices.
Bonnefon, J.-F. et al. Ethics of related and automatic autos: suggestions on highway security, privateness, equity, explainability and accountability (European Fee, 2020).
Luetge, C. The German ethics code for automated and related driving. Philos. Technol. 30, 547–558 (2017).
Santoni de Sio, F. The European Fee report on ethics of related and automatic autos and the way forward for ethics of transportation. Ethics Inf. Technol. 23, 713–726 (2021).
Adnan, N. Exploring the long run: a meta-analysis of autonomous automobile adoption and its affect on city life and the healthcare sector. Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Persp. 26, 101110 (2024).
Tussyadiah, I. A overview of analysis into automation in tourism: launching the annals of tourism analysis curated assortment on synthetic intelligence and robotics in tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 81, 102883 (2020).
Zeng, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, X. & Li, Z. Retrospective of interdisciplinary analysis on robotic companies (1954–2023): from parasitism to symbiosis. Technol. Soc. 78, 102636 (2024).
Benkler, Y. Don’t let trade write the foundations for AI. Nature 569, 161–162 (2019).
Cave, S. & Dihal, Okay. Hopes and fears for clever machines in fiction and actuality. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 74–78 (2019).
Lazer, D. et al. Computational social science: obstacles and alternatives. Science 369, 1060–1062 (2020).
Lazer, D. et al. Significant measures of human society within the twenty-first century. Nature 595, 189–196 (2021).
Munger, Okay. The restricted worth of non-replicable discipline experiments in contexts with low temporal validity. Soc. Media Soc. 5, 2056305119859294 (2019).
Munger, Okay. Temporal validity as meta-science. Res. Politics 10, 20531680231187271 (2023). This text unpacks the idea of temporal validity, a vital concern for sci-fi-sci, because it exposes the boundaries of making use of present-day empirical data to future contexts.
Wilson, T. D. & Gilbert, D. T. Affective forecasting. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35, 345–411 (2003).
Schönmann, M., Bodenschatz, A., Uhl, M. & Walkowitz, G. Contagious people: a pandemic’s constructive impact on attitudes in the direction of care robots. Technol. Soc. 76, 102464 (2024).
Inhorn, M. C. & Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. Assisted reproductive applied sciences and tradition change. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 37, 177–196 (2008).
Dinh, C. T., Humphries, S. & Chatterjee, A. Public opinion on cognitive enhancement varies throughout totally different conditions. Am. J. Bioethics 11, 224–237 (2020).
Mihailov, E., López, B. R., Cova, F. & Hannikainen, I. R. How capsules undermine expertise: moralization of cognitive enhancement and causal choice. Acutely aware. Cogn. 91, 103120 (2021).
Sattler, S. et al. Neuroenhancements within the army: a mixed-method pilot examine on attitudes of employees officers to ethics and guidelines. Neuroethics 15, 11 (2022).
Lucas, S., Douglas, T. & Faber, N. S. How ethical bioenhancement impacts perceived praiseworthiness. Bioethics 38, 129–137 (2024).
Laakasuo, M. et al. What makes individuals approve or condemn thoughts add expertise? untangling the consequences of sexual disgust, purity and science fiction familiarity. Palgrave Commun. 4, 84 (2018).
Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S. & Watts, D. J. Experimental examine of inequality and unpredictability in a synthetic cultural market. Science 311, 854–856 (2006).
Longoni, C. & Cian, L. Synthetic intelligence in utilitarian vs. hedonic contexts: the ’word-of-machine’ impact. J. Mark. 86, 91–108 (2022).
Köbis, N. et al. Synthetic intelligence can facilitate egocentric choices by altering the looks of interplay companions. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.04484 (2023).
Benvegnù, G., Pluchino, P. & Garnberini, L. Digital morality: utilizing digital actuality to review ethical habits in excessive accident conditions. In 2021 IEEE Digital Actuality and 3D Consumer Interfaces 316–325 (IEEE, 2021).
Sütfeld, L. R., Ehinger, B. V., König, P. & Pipa, G. How does the strategy change what we measure? evaluating digital actuality and text-based surveys for the evaluation of ethical choices in site visitors dilemmas. PLoS ONE 14, e0223108 (2019).
Faulhaber, A. Okay. et al. Human choices in ethical dilemmas are largely described by utilitarianism: Digital automotive driving examine offers tips for autonomous driving autos. Sci. Eng. Ethics 25, 399–418 (2019).
Riek, L. D. Wizard of Oz research in HRI: a scientific overview and new reporting tips. J. Hum. Robotic Work together. 1, 119–136 (2012).
Aroyo, A. M. et al. Will individuals morally crack beneath the authority of a well-known depraved robotic? In 2018 twenty seventh IEEE Worldwide Symposium on Robotic and Human Interactive Communication 35–42 (IEEE, 2018).
Bishop, S. L., Kobrick, R., Battler, M. & Binsted, Okay. Fmars 2007: stress and coping in an Arctic Mars simulation. Acta Astronautica 66, 1353–1367 (2010).
Alfano, C. A., Bower, J. L., Cowie, J., Lau, S. & Simpson, R. J. Lengthy-duration house exploration and emotional well being: suggestions for conceptualizing and evaluating threat. Acta Astronautica 142, 289–299 (2018). This text evaluations strategies for forecasting emotional well being dangers throughout a Mars mission, an excessive case of sci-fi-sci aimed toward predicting human responses in radically novel, high-stakes environments.
Riva, P., Rusconi, P., Pancani, L. & Chterev, Okay. Social isolation in house: an investigation of LUNARK, the primary human mission in an Arctic Moon analog habitat. Acta Astronautica 195, 215–225 (2022).
Sweet, S. & Potter, C. Design and Futures, vol. 1. J. Futures Stud. (2019).
Sweet, S. & Potter, C. Design and Futures, vol. 2. J. Futures Stud. (2019). The 2 volumes of this particular difficulty are a treasure trove of progressive strategies for designing immersive future simulations, providing sci-fi-sci researchers a wealthy toolbox for experimental protocols grounded in a tangible expertise.
Palmer, A. Too Just like the Lightning (Tor Books, 2016).
Gall, T., Vallet, F. & Yannou, B. Methods to visualise futures research ideas: revision of the futures cone. Futures 143, 103024 (2022).
Coolidge, F. L., Wynn, T., Overmann, Okay. A. & Hicks, J. M. in Human Paleoneurology (ed. Bruner, E.) 177–208 (Springer, 2015).
North, D. C. Construction and efficiency: the duty of financial historical past. J. Econ. Lit. 16, 963–978 (1978).
von Schenk, A., Klockmann, V., Bonnefon, J.-F., Rahwan, I. & Köbis, N. Lie detection algorithms disrupt the social dynamics of accusation habits. iScience 27, 110201 (2024).
Héder, M. From NASA to EU: the evolution of the TRL scale in public sector innovation. Innov. J. 22, 1–23 (2017). This text unpacks the evolution and potential misuses of the expertise readiness stage scale, which can assist sci-fi-sci researchers to decide on speculative applied sciences which might be nonetheless unsure, however not untethered from actuality.
Coccia, M. Measuring depth of technological change: the seismic method. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 72, 117–144 (2005).
Goodall, N. J. Moral choice making throughout automated automobile crashes. Transp. Res. Rec. 2424, 58–65 (2014).
Hess, D. J. Incumbent-led transitions and civil society: autonomous automobile coverage and client organizations in america. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 151, 119825 (2020).
Kriebitz, A., Max, R. & Lütge, C. The German act on autonomous driving: why ethics nonetheless issues. Philos. Technol. 35, 29 (2022).
Mac Síthigh, D. & Siems, M. The Chinese language social credit score system: a mannequin for different international locations? Mod. L. Rev. 82, 1034–1071 (2019).
Orgad, L. & Reijers, W. A Dystopian Future? The Rise of Social Credit score Methods. Technical Report RSCAS 2019/94 (Robert Schuman Centre for Superior Research, 2019).
Tirole, J. Digital dystopia. Am. Econ. Rev. 111, 2007–2048 (2021).
Purcell, Z. A. & Bonnefon, J.-F. People really feel too particular for machines to attain their morals. PNAS Nexus 2, pgad179 (2023).
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying Down Harmonised Guidelines on Synthetic Intelligence (Synthetic Intelligence Act) and Amending Sure Union Legislative Acts https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206 (European Fee, 2021).
Turley, P. et al. Issues with utilizing polygenic scores to pick out embryos. N. Engl. J. Med. 385, 78–86 (2021).
Anomaly, J. Creating Future Individuals: The Ethics of Genetic Enhancement (Taylor & Francis, 2020).
Anomaly, J., Gyngell, C. & Savulescu, J. Nice minds assume totally different: preserving cognitive variety in an age of gene enhancing. Bioethics 34, 81–89 (2020).
Gyngell, C. & Douglas, T. Stocking the genetic grocery store: reproductive genetic applied sciences and collective motion issues. Bioethics 29, 241–250 (2015).
Cavaliere, G. Ectogenesis and gender-based oppression: resisting the best of assimilation. Bioethics 34, 727–734 (2020).
Hooton, V. & Romanis, E. C. Synthetic womb expertise, being pregnant, and EU employment rights. J. L. Biosci. 9, lsac009 (2022).
Horn, C. Ectogenesis, inequality, and coercion: a reproductive justice-informed evaluation of the affect of synthetic wombs. BioSocieties 18, 523–544 (2023).
MacKay, Okay. The ‘tyranny of replica’: may ectogenesis additional girls’s liberation? Bioethics 34, 346–353 (2020).
Lin, P. in Autonomous Driving: Technical, Authorized and Social Points (eds Maurer, M.) 69–85 (Springer Vieweg, 2016).
Milakis, D. Lengthy-term implications of automated autos: an introduction. Transp. Rev. 39, 1–8 (2019).
Soteropoulos, A., Berger, M. & Ciari, F. Impacts of automated autos on journey behaviour and land use: a world overview of modelling research. Transp. Rev. 39, 29–49 (2019).
Fernández Llorca, D. & Gómez, E. Reliable Autonomous Autos—Evaluation Standards for Reliable AI within the Autonomous Driving Area (European Union, 2021).
Asimov, I. I, Robotic (Gnome Press, 1950).
McDermott, D. in Machine Ethics (eds Anderson, M. & Anderson, S. L.) 88–114 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
Hirai, Okay., Hirose, M., Haikawa, Y. & Takenaka, T. The Growth of Honda Humanoid Robotic. In Proc. 1998 IEEE Worldwide Convention on Robotics and Automation Vol. 2, 1321–1326 (IEEE, 1998).
Ishiguro, H. et al. Robovie: an interactive humanoid robotic. Ind. Robotic 28, 498–504 (2001).
Breazeal, C. Designing Sociable Robots (MIT Press, 2004).
Jennings, N. R., Norman, T. J., Faratin, P., O’Brien, P. & Odgers, B. Autonomous brokers for enterprise course of administration. Appl. Artif. Intel. 14, 145–189 (2000).
Reijers, H. A. Enterprise course of administration: the evolution of a self-discipline. Comput. Ind. 126, 103404 (2021).
Humanoid Robotic Market Measurement, Share & Trade Evaluation, by Movement Sort (Biped and Wheel Drive), by Element ({Hardware} and Software program), by Utility (Industrial, Family, and Providers), and Regional Forecast 2024–2032. Technical Report (Fortune Enterprise Insights, 2024).
Dafoe, A. et al. Cooperative AI: machines should be taught to seek out widespread floor. Nature 593, 33–36 (2021).
Acemoglu, D. & Restrepo, P. Automation and new duties: how expertise displaces and reinstates labor. J. Financial Perspect. 33, 3–30 (2019).
Crandall, J. W. et al. Cooperating with machines. Nat. Commun. 9, 233 (2018).
Ishowo-Oloko, F. et al. Behavioural proof for a transparency–effectivity tradeoff in human–machine cooperation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 517–521 (2019).
Karpus, J., Krüger, A., Verba, J. T., Bahrami, B. & Deroy, O. Algorithm exploitation: people are eager to use benevolent AI. iScience 24, 102679 (2021).
Oudah, M., Makovi, Okay., Grey, Okay., Battu, B. & Rahwan, T. Notion of expertise influences altruism and notion of company influences belief in human–machine interactions. Sci. Rep. 14, 12410 (2024).
Makovi, Okay., Sargsyan, A., Li, W., Bonnefon, J.-F. & Rahwan, T. Belief inside human–machine collectives is determined by the perceived consensus about cooperative norms. Nat. Commun. 14, 3108 (2023).
Dong, M., Bonnefon, J.-F. & Rahwan, I. Towards human-centered AI administration: methodological challenges and future instructions. Technovation 131, 102953 (2024).
Bubeck, S. et al. Sparks of synthetic common intelligence: early experiments with GPT-4. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12712 (2023).
Wu, Q. et al. Autogen: enabling next-gen LLM purposes through multi-agent dialog framework. In First Convention on Language Modeling https://openreview.web/discussion board?id=BAakY1hNKS (OpenReview, 2024).
Bamberger, S., Clark, N., Ramachandran, S. & Sokolova, V. How generative AI is already remodeling customer support. Boston Consulting Group www.bcg.com/publications/2023/how-generative-ai-transforms-customer-service (2023).